Development of an Integrated Quality System Index (QSI) for Aviation Ground Handling Operations Using the Fuzzy LAAW Method

Authors

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.31181/jidmgc21202651

Keywords:

Ground Handling, Multi-Criteria Decision Making, LAAW Method, Quality System Index, Performance Measurement

Abstract

Ground handling has become increasingly complex, creating a growing need for comprehensive performance measurement that integrates multiple dimensions of operational quality. This study develops an integrated Quality System Index (QSI) that combines key performance indicators (KPIs) related to safety, security, service quality, and regulatory compliance into a unified assessment framework. KPIs from these four dimensions are structured hierarchically, and their relative importance is determined using judgments collected from a panel of 96 ground-handling professionals with expertise in the respective areas. The experts are classified into three organizational groups: directors and managers, coordination and station chiefs, and auditors and specialists. A fuzzy multi-criteria decision-making framework based on the Logarithmic Additive-Weighting-Coefficient Estimation (LAAW) method is employed to determine KPI weights and analyze differences in perceived importance across organizational levels. The proposed QSI is designed not only to provide an overall performance score but also to prevent strong performance in one dimension from compensating for unacceptable performance in critical areas such as safety, security, or regulatory compliance. The framework therefore combines integrated performance assessment with the identification of dimension-specific weaknesses. The resulting QSI can support comparisons among ground-handling stations and reporting periods, facilitate the identification of previously unrecognized performance deficiencies, and guide continuous improvement initiatives. The analysis further reveals KPIs whose importance remains consistent across organizational groups and those whose perceived importance varies according to organizational responsibility.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

MoghadasNian, S. A. H., & Mojavezi, S. (2024). KPI-driven decision making in airport services: Enhancing operational efficiency, customer satisfaction, and sustainability. https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.19966514

Yazgan, E., Durmaz, V., Yılmaz, A. K., & N Malagas, K. (2022). Integrated risk assessment in ramp handling operations: Risk mapping for Turkish airports. International Journal of Aviation, Aeronautics, and Aerospace, 9(4), 4. https://doi.org/10.58940/2374-6793.1761

Valko, A., Soloviova, O., Volkovska, G., & Herasymenko, I. (2021). Constructing a system of integrated management of aviation safety as a key element of airport service quality. Eastern-European Journal of Enterprise Technologies, 4(3), 112. https://doi.org/10.15587/1729-4061.2021.239168

Panagopoulos, I., Atkin, C., & Sikora, I. (2017). Developing a performance indicators lean-sigma framework for measuring aviation system's safety performance. Transportation Research Procedia, 22, 35–44. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.trpro.2017.03.005

de Vré, M., & Richardson, D. A. (2019). When compliance checks are just the start of the journey: An aviation case. MATEC Web of Conferences, 273, 01009. https://doi.org/10.1051/matecconf/201927301009

Kulaklı, A., & Şahin, Y. (2023). A combined multi-criteria decision-making approach for improvement of airlines' ground operations performance: A case study from Türkiye. Systems, 11(8), 421. https://doi.org/10.3390/systems11080421

Akyurt, İ. Z. (2026). Analysis of ground handling performance criteria using the fuzzy LAAW method. Computer and Decision Making – An International Journal, 3, 838–858. https://comdem.org/index.php/comdem/article/view/18121

Tadić, S., Milovanović, M., Krstić, M., & Čokorilo, O. (2025). Selection of safety measures in aircraft operations: A hybrid grey Delphi–AHP-ADAM MCDM model. Eng, 6(11), 295. https://doi.org/10.3390/eng6110295

Deveci, M., Cali, U., & Pamucar, D. (2021). Evaluation of criteria for site selection of solar photovoltaic (PV) projects using fuzzy logarithmic additive estimation of weight coefficients. Energy Reports, 7, 8805–8824. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.egyr.2021.10.104

İnan, T. T. (2018). Performance measurement system (PMS) and Balanced Scorecard (BSC) strategies used in the process related with ramp handling services of ground handling management. Journal of Aviation, 2(1), 1–9. https://doi.org/10.30518/jav.401511

Akbaba, A. (2021). Havayolu operasyon yönetiminde stratejilerin entegrasyonu ile ilgili Balanced Score Card uygulaması. Üçüncü Sektör Sosyal Ekonomi Dergisi, 56(1), 371–389. https://tisej.com/index.php/pub/en/article/view/569

Eboli, L., Bellizzi, M. G., & Mazzulla, G. (2022). A literature review of studies analysing air transport service quality from the passengers' point of view. Promet – Traffic & Transportation, 34(2), 253–269. https://doi.org/10.7307/ptt.v34i2.4020

Mugabo, J. P., & Gökdalay, M. (2026). The performance evaluation of ground handling companies: MCDM approach. Anadolu Üniversitesi İktisadi ve İdari Bilimler Fakültesi Dergisi, 27(1), 261–292. https://doi.org/10.53443/anadoluibfd.1732609

Akyurt, İ. Z., & Kabadayı, N. (2020). Bulanık AHP ve bulanık gri ilişkisel analiz yöntemleri ile kargo uçak tipi seçimi: Bir Türk havayolu firmasında uygulama. Journal of Yaşar University, 15(57), 38–55. https://doi.org/10.19168/jyasar.609416

International Civil Aviation Organization. (2016). Annex 19: Safety management. ICAO. https://www.icao.int/safety-management/access-icao-annexes-and-guidance

Uchroński, P. (2020). Analysis of the operation of the ground handling agent in the aspect of safety. Journal of KONBiN, 50(1), 319–339. https://doi.org/10.2478/jok-2020-0019

MoghadasNian, S. A. H., & AzarHoush, A. (2024). Enhancing airline safety management: Strategic insights into KPI-driven oversight. https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.18676862

Bongo, M. F., & Ocampo, L. A. (2018). Exploring critical attributes during air traffic congestion with a fuzzy DEMATEL–ANP technique: A case study in Ninoy Aquino International Airport. Journal of Modern Transportation, 26(2), 147–161. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40534-017-0150-x

Kurt, Y., & Gerede, E. (2017). Evaluation of safety management systems in the Turkish ground handling and airport terminal companies. Elektronik Sosyal Bilimler Dergisi, 16(61), 369–369. https://doi.org/10.17755/esosder.304680

MoghadasNian, S. A. H., & Souizi, N. (2024). Elevating airline operations: A strategic framework for quality assurance and compliance monitoring. In 4th International Conference on Advanced Researches in Management and Humanities. https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.18765853

Çiçek, I., & Tezdoğan, E. (2026). Quality management as a strategic shift in challenging times: Evidence from ground-handling enterprises. American Journal of Business Science Philosophy, 3(1), 88–103. https://doi.org/10.70122/ajbsp.v3i1.7

Hatipoğlu, S., Ergül, H., & Kepti, Y. (2025). Enhancing service quality in aviation: The critical role of ground handling services. Politeknik Dergisi, 28(6), 1843–1851. https://doi.org/10.2339/politeknik.1659840

Çiçek, I. (2024). The sustainability evaluation for ground-handling companies. Necmettin Erbakan Üniversitesi Siyasal Bilgiler Fakültesi Dergisi, 6(2), 2. https://doi.org/10.51124/jneusbf.2024.100

Milbredt, O., & Deutschmann, A. (2016). Key performance indicator for security measurement at airports. In AIAA Modeling and Simulation Technologies Conference. https://doi.org/10.2514/6.2016-4300

Nwaogbe, O. R., Odiobulu, S. P., & Omoke, V. (2021). Study of a category one airport operational safety and security in Abuja, Nigeria. Scientific Journal of Silesian University of Technology. Series Transport, 112, 171–189. https://doi.org/10.20858/sjsutst.2021.112.7.14

Published

2026-09-11

How to Cite

İşleyen, H. M. (2026). Development of an Integrated Quality System Index (QSI) for Aviation Ground Handling Operations Using the Fuzzy LAAW Method. Journal of Intelligent Decision Making and Granular Computing, 2(1), 304-315. https://doi.org/10.31181/jidmgc21202651